The “Breath Holding” Challenge

<< All Resources
Share:

What Does the “Breath Holding” Challenge Involve?

The “Breath Holding” Challenge is a dangerous social media trend in which children or teens try to hold their breath for as long as possible, sometimes underwater, sometimes while applying pressure to the neck, or while copying videos that present the behavior as a game.

The challenge can look simple or even harmless at first because it is framed as endurance, bravery, or a way to prove control. The real concern is that restricting breathing or reducing oxygen to the brain can lead to fainting, falls, drowning, seizures, cardiac problems, or life-threatening injury.

In early 2026, school and safety authorities in Dubai warned families about dangerous physical challenges being reported among students, including choking, breath holding, pressure to the head or neck, and other viral behaviors. For parents, the key point is that these are not jokes or playground games. They are online-influenced behaviors that can become dangerous very quickly.

Why This Trend Is Dangerous?

The danger comes from the way the challenge hides risk behind simple instructions. A teen may think they are only holding their breath for a few seconds, but oxygen loss can affect judgment, balance, and consciousness very quickly.

  • A child can faint without enough warning to stop safely.
  • If the challenge happens in water, fainting can quickly become drowning.
  • If pressure is placed on the neck, breathing and blood flow can both be affected.
  • If a teen collapses, the fall itself can cause head, neck, or back injuries.
  • Trying to film the challenge can delay help because friends may focus on the video instead of the danger.

What Parents May Notice?

Parents do not need to know every version of every online challenge. It is more useful to notice changes in language, behavior, and secrecy around risky content.

  • Mentions of breath holding, blackout games, choking games, passing out, or “how long can you last” challenges.
  • Videos or searches about dangerous dares, school challenges, or ways to make someone faint.
  • Unexplained dizziness, headaches, fainting, bloodshot eyes, or marks around the neck.
  • Sudden secrecy around social media, group chats, or videos shared by classmates.

A calm question is often the best first step. Parents can ask what their child has seen, whether classmates are talking about it, and whether anyone has tried it at school or online.

David Gil,

Research team lead at PureSight

child protection, dangers, parenting

Jonathan Haidt, Pac-Man, and What Parents Are Missing

<< All Resources
Share:

Like many parents, I recently received a message from my wife with a link to a podcast by Jonathan Haidt. She sent it with a note of deep concern about how the digital world is affecting our young daughters.

It was ironic. Why? Because I am the CEO of PureSight, a company that builds tools to help parents navigate exactly these challenges.

Haidt himself notes that most of his book’s buyers are mothers. They are often the first to spot these behavioral changes in children and bring this critical discussion to the family table.

The “Kids These Days” Trap

I agree with Haidt on one fundamental point: our kids are behaving differently because of screens and social media. These are challenges that previous generations never faced.

However, I believe his analysis is missing something.

Older generations always complain about “the youth of today.” I am Gen X, and there is a famous joke about my generation:

“If Pac-Man had affected us as kids, we’d all be running around in dark rooms, munching pills and listening to repetitive electronic music.”

Technically? Maybe it was true. We played video games, and later we went to dark clubs. But in the end, we turned out okay.

I believe our kids will be okay too. The digital world gives them amazing advantages we never had. Yes, there are new challenges, but we need to adapt, not panic.

Don’t Blame the Government, Empower the Parents

The biggest piece missing from Haidt’s view is the role of the family.

He focuses heavily on tech giants and asks the government for more regulations. He implies that parents are helpless against these companies.

But history shows that bans don’t really work. When Facebook required users to be 13+, it didn’t stop children. It just taught them to lie about their age to open an account.

Guidance over Bans

I believe it is safer for us to know where our kids are online. If we simply ban platforms, children will move to “underground” apps where we cannot help them.

Our job as parents is to educate, guide, and protect, just like we teach them to cross a busy street.

Digital life is here to stay. Our kids are not ready to face it alone; they need our compass. I believe in a balanced approach:

  1. Allow them to enter the digital world.
  2. Equip parents with tools to monitor activity and get alerts if the kids encounter dangerous content.

Looking to the Future

Serious incidents do happen online, and we must remain alert. But we should not try to turn back time.

I am confident that in a few years, we will look at this generation’s achievements with pride. And inevitably, they will grow up to stress about the changes facing their own children. 😊

online child safety, parenting, safe internet use
Don’t wait, Schedule Puresight demo today!